Operation Moonshot — What could only seem like a concept derived from the darkest corners of the internet is anything but a hypothetical — it’s becoming mainstream. The British Medical Journal, one of the most prestigious medical journals in the world has recently released a document detailing what the leaked documents say.
The documents call for a massive uptick in testing — and in a very condensed timeframe. “They state that the UK will carry out between 200,000 to 800,000 tests a day between September and December 2020.” That is an enormous increase from the current total tests performed during the entire “pandemic” sitting at about 230,000 tests per day. They then call for an astronomical “10 million tests a day, to “enable people to return to and maintain normal life.”
The documents continues to detail how citizens, with a large list of conditions that must be satisfied, could obtain a “normal” life again. “At this stage, weekly testing would be made available progressively to the whole population to allow people to go to high risk events by using a “digital passport” to show they have tested negative for the virus.” It then goes on to say that this will “likely be available through an app.”
What does a digital passport entail?
The concept for a digital passport was allegedly designed to “give people assurance that, at least for a limited time, they are unlikely to have the virus and are at low risk of transmitting it to others.” However a quick read into the government over-reaches, and even an individual who agrees with that premise for “safety” sake should become quickly alarmed.
The documents call for “testing for access to certain spaces, with reference to “immunity/virus free passports.” The document details how your test results would inform you whether or not you could work for the day, attend an in-patient appointment, access a venue, get on a flight, or even visit an elderly relative. Being aware of the gross inaccuracy of PCR testing, and the lack of a gold standard for testing — this is a recipe for absolute tyranny.
The plan to get the public on board
How do you get people on board with such a draconian overstep? How do you convince the populace that tyranny, and the stripping of their rights is the only way back to “normal”? The short answer is you don’t. To steal a company slogan, you “just do it.” “They point to enforcing testing ‘via a sanction-based model’ or through ‘offering individuals opportunities/access from being tested,’ such as being able to attend events.”
So a sanction based model would require an “authoritative permission or approval, for an action” and the other model will restrict your ability to have access to events and “normal” life unless you submit to a test with a high degree of false positives — and one that’s being challenged in court for not being isolated with the scientific method. What a fantastic tyrannical idea — it’s fit for a dictator! Stalin, Mao and Hitler would most certainly approve of such a scheme.
Do the documents acknowledge any concerns?
Although the documents don’t go into great detail, they do mention some concerns — ironically they involve COVID testing.
“‘In reference to the non-PCR tests, it is repeatedly noted that “new types of test are likely to be less accurate [than PCR], introducing some level of risk.’ In terms of how testing would affect behaviour, the documents say that regular testing ‘might make people behave in safer ways, by building COVID-safe routines into their daily lives, or less safely by giving false a degree of comfort.'”
As we have noted in our article about COVID testing — PCR tests are very unreliable. They can pick up dead virus from months ago! It is reassuring I suppose, to know that the new testing that will be used is less accurate than the already disastrous PCR test used by governments around the world to detect COVID.
The documents also admit one more ominous admission. Apparently Prime Minister Boris Johnson can’t think of any other way to deal with COVID then to strip away all of your rights, and create a tyrannical state where you need the governments permission to go about your life. No matter the rationalization, the people have not consented to an elite few being able to determine the dictates of the most minute details of their daily life — nor will we ever give governments that power.
For those who would be quick to demonize this article I would ask “why won’t the government debate the experts who don’t agree?” If you are 100 percent correct in your narrative, if you are upholding the truth, you don’t need to with-hold your studies, or avoid debating with those whom don’t agree with you. In fact, when you know that you are correct and standing in truth you should be eager to tell others just why you are confident that you are correct.
We have yet to see this out of governments around the world. An eagerness to debate those who don’t agree with what they’ve been spoon feeding the public.
Diverge Media doesn’t get media bailout money like the mainstream media, we work hard in our free-time outside of our regular jobs to tell the other side of the story and produce content like this. If you can spare a few dollars, any amount can be selected by donating below or visit the Donate To Diverge page on our site. Thank you in advance.